Understanding Early Man : Scientific Discovery vs. Emotionally Driven Hypothesis :: Anthropology Essays Paleontology Papers

Understanding Early Man Scientific Discovery vs. emotionally Driven HypothesisThe ways in which we attempt to determine the memoir of azoic man say much to a greater extent close who we atomic number 18 today, and who we will be tomorrow, and who we want to be today, and who we want to be tomorrow, than they do about(predicate) who we were in the past. This statement comes from a person who k this instants little about science, and less about the specific scientific techniques used in archaeological excavation and analysis. But it seems to me that much of the observations that are made in the flying field of early man are predicated as much on impudent conjecture as they are on rare observation, and much of the old observation seems to be based on how humans act now, alternatively than in the past.For instance, an entire new field of larn known as Evolutionary Psychology is based on the premise that we can fancy who we are today based on how we have evolved, and what we have evolved from. Evolution, is more or less a proven fact, analogous to gravity, it is a theory that we have used to understand countless other phenomena in the humans around us. But there is no theory about how early man behaved, how he evolved, or even, what he looked like, that comes even close to world as widely accepted. In other words, this new field of psychoanalyse is based on science that does non yet exist, and might not ever exist, and the thinking behind it is similar to thinking behind the study of early man. Evolutionary psychologists use things we dont know about who we were then to puree and understand who we are now, and anthropologists use things we dont know about who we are now to try and understand who we were then.Our vies about these early human ancestors echo our debates about our present and our modern history to such a degree, that in about ways, this echo seems to cast doubts on the entire process of examination.A great debate in history departme nts around the world who study the Twentieth vitamin C concerns what is known as the Great Man Theory. This theory supposes that the major events, and major social changes, of the past century were due more to the actions of a fistful of men and women (usually those in positions of great power, or those who made important scientific discoveries) rather than to the actions of the majority.