Analyze the Conventional Wisdom Regarding the Iliegal Immigration Essay

Analyze the Conventional Wisdom Regarding the Iliegal Immigration Debate - Essay Example Besides, the arguments on illegal immigration deeply influence the development of conventional wisdom on the same subject. Thesis statement: The conventional wisdom regarding the illegal immigration debate in America is deeply influenced by the arguments in favor of and against illegal immigration and the related problems. Arguments in favor of illegal immigration The scope of the policy of amnesty and illegal immigration As pointed out, the arguments in favor of illegal immigration deeply influenced the conventional wisdom regarding the illegal immigration debate. To be specific, the people of America are aware of the fact that their lineage is rooted in immigration from European nations, African continent and some parts of the Asian continent. One can see that the native population of the American continent consists of the American Indians. Almost all the other racial groups in America are related to immigrant population. Therefore, those who are in favor of illegal immigration arg ue that illegal immigration must not be considered as illegal because economic disparity is the main reason behind it. Steiner opined that â€Å"More likely, illegal immigration rose because the United States economy demanded it, and illegal immigration would have risen even if amnesties had not been granted† (41). Those who try to immigrate to America are not aware of the problem of illegal immigration. ... They believe implementation of laws and regulations related to illegal immigration can reduce the problem in future, and the current laws cannot solve the problems faced by the illegal immigrant in America. In addition, those who are not in favor of illegal immigration argue that the illegal immigration must be considered as an international problem, not as a regional or national problem. Humanitarian consideration/ human rights and illegal immigration Those who are in favor of illegal immigration argue that deportation or similar actions against the so-called illegal immigrants are a violation of human rights. The liberal humanitarians including the working class in America consider that the government must take apt measures to reduce the problems faced by the illegal immigrant population in America. Hill stated that â€Å"It is little wonder that these kaleidoscopic overlaps and divergences lead some to argue that the real divide in the immigration debate is between educated and d efenders of the U.S. poor and working class† (196). Besides, those who are in favor of illegal immigration argue that illegal immigrants face marginalization in the American society. They argue that governments must try to amalgamate the illegal immigrants into the core of the mainstream society. At the same time, the strict implementation of laws related to illegal immigration/human trafficking can reduce the scope of problems related to illegal immigration. Arguments against illegal immigration Barbed-wire fences and border security As pointed out, the conventional wisdom regarding the illegal immigration debate is influenced by anti-illegal immigration arguments. The history of